Welcome to PoliticalColonoscopy.com, where we give democracy a check-up, make sure everything’s functioning, and maybe throw in some fiber for good measure. Today, we’re diving into the reason we fact-check politicians—even the ones we like—because intellectual integrity is like flossing: not fun, but absolutely necessary.
Why bother fact-checking Kamala Harris, who we endorse with open arms and a glass of champagne? Simple: politicians, whether they’re running for office or currently holding it, are our employees. And in Vice President Kamala Harris’ case, she’s both applying for a new gig (President of the United States) and already has a job. So yes, it might feel like nitpicking, but when you’re the boss—and we, the voters, are the bosses—there’s nothing wrong with checking your employee’s work.
Kamala’s Big Texas Truth: Nailed It
During her CNN Town Hall on October 23, 2024, Harris dropped some real talk about Texas’ abortion laws, saying doctors could face life in prison for performing illegal abortions. Now, that sounds more like a plot from “The Handmaid’s Tale” than reality, but guess what? Kamala is 100% on point  . Texas’ abortion law is about as forgiving as a passive-aggressive roommate, with penalties so severe that they’re basically daring you to question their sanity.
So, for those keeping score, Kamala’s checkmark for truth on that claim? Absolutely deserved. Doctors really could be facing lifetime sentences for providing abortion care under Texas law. And for pointing out these kinds of dystopian realities, we give Harris a big round of applause. That’s a hard truth, but it’s an important one.
But About That Billionaire Tax Claim
Now, let’s get to the part where we’re all, “Come on, Kamala.” Harris has a favorite line she loves to roll out: that teachers, nurses, and firefighters pay a higher tax rate than billionaires. And while this sounds like the kind of fact that makes you want to throw your remote at the TV and go storm a hedge fund, it’s just not quite accurate .
Yes, billionaires have more tax loopholes than a block of Swiss cheese, but the idea that your average teacher is paying a higher percentage? Not really. Billionaires pay an average tax rate of around 16%, while your teacher is closer to 12% to 15%. So while Kamala’s heart is in the right place—because honestly, billionaires could probably spare a few extra bucks—it’s not the slam dunk it sounds like. It’s like she’s throwing confetti before the parade has even started.
But does that make us abandon our endorsement of Harris? Absolutely not. This is more of a “we see what you’re trying to do, but double-check the math next time” kind of moment. A small hiccup in an otherwise strong record.
Trump: The Human Pinball Machine of Facts
Now let’s talk about Donald Trump, the guy who treats facts like they’re optional side dishes at a buffet. When Trump speaks, you can almost see the fact-checkers reaching for their blood pressure medication. During one of his recent rallies, Trump claimed that Harris’ policies would raise taxes on the typical American family by $3,000. Three thousand dollars. Let that sink in. It’s the kind of number that makes people clutch their wallets and wonder if they should start bartering for groceries .
But surprise, surprise, there’s zero evidence to support that claim. Trump might as well have said, “Harris’ policies will raise taxes by 17 llamas and a cappuccino!” It would’ve been just as grounded in reality. This kind of made-up-on-the-spot statement is classic Trump—big, bold, and completely untethered from the truth.
And here’s where the difference becomes clear. Harris stretches the truth to make a point; Trump plays a whole different game, where facts are just suggestions.
Why Fact-Check? Because We’re the Bosses
So why do we fact-check Kamala Harris? Why hold our own side to the same standard we hold Trump to? Because intellectual integrity matters. We can’t wag our fingers at Trump for his Pinocchio-like behavior while giving our own candidate a free pass. Fact-checking is like a performance review for our political employees, and if we want them to do the job right, we have to make sure they’re being honest with us.
And here’s the bottom line: we endorse Kamala Harris. We like her policies, her vision, and her leadership. But we also believe in fairness. She works for us—just like Trump did—and if we don’t check our own side, we’re just hypocrites. This isn’t about knocking Kamala down; it’s about making sure she stays sharp, stays honest, and continues to be the candidate we believe in. After all, we’re the ones hiring the President.
In conclusion, if you’re looking for someone who has mostly got their facts right (and, okay, occasionally embellishes), Harris is your gal. If you want someone who treats facts like they’re up for negotiation, well… you know where to find Trump. But in a world where truth matters, we’re sticking with Kamala. With a side of fact-checking, of course.
